Drawing for NEAR

USPTO serial 88772150

NEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAGLINI, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric J. von Vorys

Eric J. von Vorys Shulman Rogers Gandal Pordy & Ecker, P.A.12505 Park Potomac AvenueSixth FloorPotomac, MD 20854

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publications in the field of blockchain technology, namely, briefs, newsletters, blog posts, journals, articles, case studies, practice guides, manuals, abstracts, fact sheets, white papers, and reports in the field of blockchain technology; downloadable computer software for enabling the creation of software applications to be deployed using blockchain technology; downloadable computer application software for operating a decentralized blockchain network, namely, distributed application software for data processing, secure data sharing, and managing financial and application-specific transactions on a blockchain and all the libraries and tools that provide third party developers the ability to interact with this blockchain by enabling them to upload their software into this network and conduct further transactionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2023EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 22, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 22, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Aug 17, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2023EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 17, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 13, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2022EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2022EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 11, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 12, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 18, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance