USPTO serial 88774317
GO BIG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GO BIG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Sereboff
Steven C. Sereboff SOCAL IP LAW GROUP LLP310 N. WESTLAKE BLVD., SUITE 120WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91362UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer game software; computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; downloadable electronic games via the internet and wireless devices; downloadable interactive multimedia computer game programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game for single users or multiple users; providing a computer game for use network-wide by network users | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |