USPTO serial 88775438
LUMBERMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUMBERMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oro-Medonte, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas J. Gingo
Nicholas J. Gingo RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 EUCLID AVE.19TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | portable band sawmills and accessories, namely, manual log rollers, hydraulic log turners; manual and hydraulic toe boards; lap siding and shingle makers; bed extensions; power-feed and power sawhead packages consisting of electric motors, control boxes and remotes; hydraulic log loaders; sawmill log clamping mechanisms, namely, machine tools in the nature of clamps for use in the clamping of logs to sawmill; log handling tools, namely, bed levelers; sawmill accessories, namely, bed support jacks, legs and stands; sawmill accessories, namely, blade systems consisting of blade guide rollers or ceramic guides; portable chainsaw sawmills and accessories, namely, log handling tools, namely, hooks, carriers and peaveys; power operated lumber machines, namely, portable board edgers and sawmill accessories, namely, trailer packages consisting of axles, wheels and drawbars and bed support jacks and legs; forestry equipment in the nature of timber harvesting machines, namely, ATV and tractor log skidders, grapples, tractor-mounted hydraulic log skidders, winch-operated tree-felling jacks; covers, namely, sawmill covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Portable board edgers and accessories, namely, trailer packages consisting of axles, wheels and drawbars and support jacks and legs; manual sawmill log loader and repositioning packages consisting of ramps, winches; manually-operated blade sharpeners for band sawmill blades, tooth-setters for band sawmill blades; manually operated tree-felling jacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | accessories for the load bearing assemblies for all terrain vehicles, namely, pallet forks, log-skidding plates and winches, folding pallet forks, grader and scarifier blades, dump boxes, dump buckets, 3-point hitches, hydraulic excavators and backhoes, and augers and auger retaining brackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |