USPTO serial 88781133
SCITON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BETTS, MARCYA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCITON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN O OWENS
JONATHAN O OWENS HAVERSTOCK & OWENS LLP162 NORTH WOLFE ROADSUNNYVALE, CA 94086UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical services, namely, cosmetic skin treatments utilizing energy devices, namely, tunable skin resurfacing, phototherapy, hybrid fractional laser and body contouring, and minimally invasive medical and aesthetic treatment services, namely, laser-assisted lipolysis and procedures for improvement of body contours, cellulite and skin | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |