USPTO serial 88782121
IMAGINE WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOSCATI, JUSTIN RONALD
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMAGINE WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, DC, US
Washington, DC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT C VAN ARNAM
ROBERT C VAN ARNAM WILLIAMS MULLEN CO IP DOCKETING200 S 10TH ST STE 1600RICHMOND, VA 23219United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultancy, namely, consulting in the field of technology revenue growth; Business management consultancy in the fields of telecommunications and wireless communications technology | ACTIVE | Mar 25, 2020 |
| 042 | Computer security consultancy; Data security consultancy; Internet security consultancy; Telecommunications technology consultancy; Wireless communications technology consulting | ACTIVE | Mar 25, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |