USPTO serial 88782701
CLOUDCOMPASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLOUDCOMPASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yvonne E. Tingleaf
1211 SW FIFTH AVENUESUITE 1900PORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Legal project management services in the nature of providing legal docket management for others, with a focus of managing documents in the cloud computing landscape | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Temporary use of non-downloadable software for electronic discovery management and e-discovery and information governance programs, with a focus on managing documents in the cloud computing landscape; Consulting in the field of electronic storage of documents and e-discovery and information governance programs, with a focus on managing documents in the cloud computing landscape; Computer project management services in the field of electronic discovery via global computer networks for national and international law firms and companies; Document management services for litigation support, namely, electronic storage of files, emails, records, and documents for national and international law firms and companies; Electronic storage of documents and archived emails | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Electronic legal discovery services in the nature of reviewing electronically stored information and conducting data management, data preservation, data collection, data recovery, data forensics, data processing, data analysis, data review, data hosting, data production, data reduction, and database reconstruction of emails and other electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit for national and international companies and law firms; Electronic legal discovery and litigation support services, namely, conducting litigation support services and performing electronic legal discovery in the nature of reviewing emails and other electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit via computer networks and the Internet; Electronic discovery consulting services; Litigation support services, namely, reviewing emails and other electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit, and conducting electronic legal discovery data management, collections, forensics, processing, analysis, review, hosting, production and consulting of emails, electronically stored data, and information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit for national and international companies and law firms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lighthouse Document Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CLOUDCOMPASS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |