USPTO serial 88784946
MANI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MANI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Victoria, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen G. Mellon
Kathleen G. Mellon YOUNGBASILE3001 WEST BIG BEAVER ROADSUITE 624TROY, MI 48084Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile computer software application containing augmented reality technology permitting users to scan a geographic location for placing digital content and to view, reproduce and share such content with others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |