USPTO serial 88785638
DAVID ORTIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAJA, AMER YASIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAVID ORTIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David D. Rodrigues
David D. Rodrigues GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN P.C.270 MADISON AVENUE, 8TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Glove treatment kits, namely, kits comprised primarily of baseball glove conditioning oil and also including lace and needles for lacing gloves | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Baseball batting helmets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, shorts and underwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Glove treatment kits, namely, kits comprised primarily of lace and needles for lacing gloves and also including baseball glove conditioning oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Baseball gloves; Batting gloves; Baseballs; Training baseballs; Baseball bats; plastic baseball bats and baseballs; Foam bats and balls; Bat grips in the nature of grip tapers for baseball bats; Baseball Batting tees; baseball Bases; Pitch back trainers in the nature of baseball pitching screens; Bat and baseball-specific equipment bags in the nature of baseball glove and bat bags; Baseball training aids in the nature of baseball pitching machines, batting machines, and pitching screens; Glove treatment kits, namely, kits comprised primarily of a rubber ball and also including baseball glove conditioning oil, lace and needles for lacing gloves; Youth baseball pitching machines, Youth batting trainers in the nature of baseball batting tees and cage nets; Baseball starter sets in the nature of sports training apparatus featuring a baseball bat, ball, and tee for improving bat swings Catchers masks and pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others through the issuance of product endorsements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by David Ortiz
- Other trademarks owned by David Ortiz
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named DAVID ORTIZ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |