Drawing for CONSENSYS HEALTH

USPTO serial 88787557

CONSENSYS HEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONSENSYS HEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grant J. Steyer

Grant J. Steyer Wickens Herzer Panza35765 Chester RoadAvon, OH 44011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Developing computer software; Software design and development; Computer software development and computer programming development for others; Design and development of on-line computer software systems; Developing computer software for use in managing blockchain data; Computer software development, computer programming and maintenance of computer software for managing blockchain data; Developing customized software in the field of blockchain and distributed computing; Software development for others in the field of blockchain and distributed computing; Customized software development in the field of blockchain and distributed computing; Software development consulting in the field of blockchain and distributed computingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 13, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 13, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 15, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 10, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 5, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 5, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 5, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance