Drawing for KERNEL

USPTO serial 88788492

KERNEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KERNEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nyall Engfield

NYALL ENGFIELD CALSTRAT LAW GROUP16950 VIA DE SANTA FE SUITE 5060-107RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Air filtering installations; Air purifying apparatus; Air sterilizers; Aquarium lights; Electric air deodorizing apparatus; Ionisation apparatus for the treatment of airACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 28, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 23, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 7, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 10, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 5, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 2, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance