USPTO serial 88789985
BITNER ESTATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2021
- Examiner
- CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BITNER ESTATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY V STEPHENS
NANCY V STEPHENS FOSTER GARVEY PC1111 3RD AVENUESUITE 3000SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine; Wines | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 16, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2021 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 6, 2021 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 16, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |