USPTO serial 88791198
AAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SABAGH, LAILA TAREK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).
Need help with AAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlington, Ontario, CA
Burlington, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky PIERCE ATWOOD LLP254 COMMERCIAL STREETPORTLAND, ME 04101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automated cutting machinery, namely, computer numerical controlled (CNC) routers and waterjet cutting machines for precision cutting, shaping, and fabrication of various materials, namely common metals, semi-precious metals, precious metals, aluminum, brass, copper, stainless steel, metal composite material (MCM), aluminum composite material (ACM), wood, plywood (MDF), melamine, chipboard, high pressure laminate (HPL), cardboard, corrugated cardboard, paper, plastic, corrugated plastic, thermoplastic, polypropylene, vinyl, acrylic, foam, open cell foam, closed cell foam, polyethylene foam, polyurethane foam, EVA foam, foamboard, foam core, rubber, and fiber cement; parts, fittings, and accessories for computer numerical controlled (CNC) routers and waterjet cutting machines, namely tool changer carousels, gantries, servo motors, vacuums, cutting heads, spindles, pumps, nozzles, and controllers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for use in operating automated cutting machinery, namely, computer numerical controlled (CNC) routers and waterjet cutting machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 30, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |