USPTO serial 88792322
SWEPT SOURCE LIDAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, CLINTON J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWEPT SOURCE LIDAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Komaki-shi, Aichi, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie E. Reitz
Julie E. Reitz HONIGMAN LLP39400 WOODWARD AVENUE, SUITE 101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Testing equipment for three dimensional sensing systems in the nature of computer component testing and calibrating equipment; Testing equipment for LIDAR systems and 3-D sensors in the nature of computer component testing and calibrating equipment; Testing equipment for autonomous vehicles in the nature of computer component testing and calibrating equipment; downloadable computer software for data mining of geospatial and LIDAR data; Laser detectors for sensing the velocity of motor vehicles; Laser speed detectors; light detection and ranging apparatus in the nature of Lidar apparatus; Speed indicators; downloadable computer software and apparatus in the nature of imaging instruments for surveying; downloadable computer software for analysing and classifying objects within three-dimensional point cloud data; downloadable computer software for quality assurance; Laser object detectors for use on vehicles; Laser scanners for industrial inspection; Lasers for industrial use; Lasers for measuring purposes; Proximity sensors; Electronic proximity sensors and switches; Measuring apparatus, namely, laser distance meters; LiDAR apparatus; High performance computers for lidar signal processing; downloadable Software for lidar signal processing; Lidar and radar in the nature of an apparatus for scanning, imaging, and mapping | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, updating and rental of computer software; Updating and rental of software for data processing; Installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research in the field of electronic sensors and scanners, laser sensors and scanners, and lidar; Design and development of electronic sensors and scanners, laser sensors and scanners, and lidar for motor vehicle and electric motor vehicle systems for driver assistance and for automated or autonomous driving; Industrial research in the field of laser scanners, and systems for driver assistance and for automated or autonomous driving for motor vehicles and electric motor vehicles; Software as a service featuring software for surveying; Software as a service featuring software for analysing and classifying objects within three-dimensional point cloud data; Software as a service featuring software for quality assurance; Software as a service featuring software that delivers an automated quality assurance workflow for assessing data from LiDAR and photogrammetric products, namely, point clouds and digital surface models (DSMs); Capturing and providing data in the field of 3D surveying in the nature of scanning, imaging, and mapping; Mapping services for use in the location and tracking of physical objects | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |