USPTO serial 88792367
ELITE PERFORMANCE HEMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELITE PERFORMANCE HEMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micah Gunn
Micah Gunn Fresh IP PLC75 Port City Landing, Suite 110Mount Pleasant, SC 29464UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body oils; Body creams; Cosmetic creams; Face creams; Face and body creams; Lip balm; Non-medicated herbal body care products, namely, body oils, salves, and lip balms; Non-medicated skin creams with essential oils for use in aromatherapy; Skin creams; Skin lotions; Skin care preparations, namely, body balm; all of the foregoing containing hemp | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Balms for medical purposes; Bandages for skin wounds; Bandages impregnated with hemp or hemp derivatives having a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and containing only naturally occurring trace amounts of CBD; Aromatherapy creams for relieving stress, all of the foregoing containing hemp or hemp derivatives, said hemp or hemp derivatives having a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and containing only naturally occurring trace amounts of CBD; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary and nutritional supplements containing hemp seed protein powder and naturally occurring trace amounts of CBD derived from hemp seed; Herbal tinctures for medical purposes; Medicated balms for treatment of skin, lips, face, and body, all of the foregoing containing hemp or hemp derivatives, said hemp or hemp derivatives having a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and containing only naturally occurring trace amounts of CBD; Medicated lotions for skin, face, and body, all of the foregoing containing hemp or hemp derivatives, said hemp or hemp derivatives having a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and containing only naturally occurring trace amounts of CBD; Medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Medicinal creams for skin care; Sports cream for relief of pain; all of the foregoing containing hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and not more than trace amounts of CBD | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Sports drinks; Sports drinks enhanced with hemp seed protein powder and containing only naturally occurring trace amounts of CBD derived from hemp seed; all of the foregoing containing hemp and not containing more than trace amounts of CBD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by McMillan, Colby
- Other trademarks owned by McMillan, Colby
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named ELITE PERFORMANCE HEMP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 9, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |