Drawing for AIDEAL

USPTO serial 88794354

AIDEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEGAL, MOLLY DANIELA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIDEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hui Zhang

Hui Zhang RABIN & BERDO, PC2650 Park Tower Drive, Suite 800Vienna, VA 22180UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer programming; Computer software design; Updating of computer software; Maintenance of computer software; Rental of computer software; Computer software consultancy; Computer system analysis; Computer system design; Installation of computer software; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for displaying creative materials for advertising, promotional and marketing activities in response to users with certain characters; Computer project management services in the field of electronic data processing; Computer technology consultancy; Information technology consultancy services; Providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a website; Cloud computing featuring software for displaying creative materials for advertising, promotional and marketing activities in response to users with certain characters; Software as a service services featuring software for displaying creative materials for advertising, promotional and marketing activities in response to users with certain characters; Development of computer platformsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 11, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 10, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 9, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 8, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 4, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 29, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 22, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 10, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 7, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 15, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 2, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 8, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
May 8, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 8, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 1, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance