USPTO serial 88794638
LOVE THAT CHICKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'ROURKE, JONATHAN RYAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOVE THAT CHICKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christiane S. Campbell
Christiane S. Campbell DUANE MORRIS LLP1075 PEACHTREE STREETSUITE 2000ATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Chicken and seafood, not live; prepared meals consisting mainly of chicken or seafood; garden salads; prepared beans, namely, processed beans and cooked beans; prepared vegetables, namely, processed vegetables and cooked vegetables; pickled vegetables, all for consumption on or off the premises | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chicken sandwiches; seafood sandwiches; rice; coffee; tea; biscuits; desserts, namely, pies, pastries and doughnuts; and condiments, namely, pickle relish and sandwich relish; mustard; ketchup; mayonnaise; salad dressings, all for consumption on or off the premises | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Franchising services, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and operation of restaurants; on-line ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out and delivery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2021 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |