USPTO serial 88794967
N NEORA PROLUXE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS, KEISHA MONIQUE HARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with N NEORA PROLUXE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Willemstad, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. WARD
Robert J. Ward FOLEY & LARDNER LLPDALLAS IP SECTION2021 MCKINNEY AVENUE, SUITE 1600DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, hair masks, and scalp treatments in the nature of a non-medicated serum for distribution through independent sales representatives | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2026 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 28, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |