CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EVERLAST

USPTO serial 88797836

EVERLAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WITKOWSKI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERLAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD N ARONSON

HOWARD N ARONSON NOLTE LACKENBACH SIEGELONE CHASE ROADSCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Athletic flooring; flooring comprised of artificial turf, foam, hardwood, soft PVC vinyl, vinyl and wood, adapted for physical fitness activities; non-metal flooring; hardwood flooring; parquet flooring; rubber flooring; rubber gym flooring rolls; wood flooring; wood tile flooring; synthetic flooring materials or wall-claddings; tile flooring, not of metal; rubber floor tiles; rubber gym floor tilesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 28, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 28, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 28, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 28, 2022EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
May 16, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 16, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 16, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 20, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 19, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 19, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 19, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance