USPTO serial 88798543
VANTAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERDMAN, RACHEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VANTAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SHANGHAI SICAR AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.
SHANGHAI, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHANGHAI SICAR AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.
SHANGHAI SICAR AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.
SHANGHAI, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHANGHAI SICAR AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Sganga
Jessica Sganga KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicles; automobiles and structural parts therefor; aftermarket automobile accessories, namely, arm rests for vehicle seats; structural repair parts for motor vehicles; vehicle license plate frames and covers; vehicle seat protectors and covers; fitted vehicle covers for automobiles; aftermarket automobile accessories, namely, car interior organizer bags, luggage bags, nets, and trays specially adapted for fitting in vehicles; auto aftermarket accessories, namely, vehicle custom grills; ski carriers for vehicles; automobile roof racks; hooks specially designed for use in vehicles to hold vehicle accessories; anti-theft devices for vehicles; sun blinds adapted for automobiles; automobile wheel shields; automobile windshields; automobile seat cushions; tires, wheels, and wheel rims for vehicles; automobile chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, tops, shirts, and bottoms; headwear; footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Floor mats for vehicles; floor trays for vehicles; carpets for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing lease financing for vehicles; financing relating to vehicles; vehicle appraisal; providing information in the field of vehicle financing; providing monetary exchange services, namely, exchanging vehicles of others for cash; providing information on vehicles for sale via a global communications network, namely, vehicle valuations; motor vehicle damage appraisal services; providing extended warranties on vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Vehicle cleaning; vehicle painting; advisory services relating to vehicle repair; vehicle service stations; repair and maintenance of vehicles; vehicle detailing; vehicle repair and maintenance consultation; charging of electric vehicles; automobile customization services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHANGHAI SICAR AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SHANGHAI SICAR AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named VANTAS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |