CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ELITE PRO

USPTO serial 88805387

ELITE PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SABLE, ERIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELITE PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan A. LaVine

Jordan A. LaVine FLASTER GREENBERG PC100 FRONT STREET, SUITE 100ONE TOWER BRIDGECONSHOHOCKEN, PA 19428

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal window shutters; metal window screens; motorized metal exterior window blinds; motorized metal exterior window shades; metal exterior window blinds; metal exterior window shadesACTIVE—
017Tinted plastic films for windows; anti-glare films for windows; reflective plastic films for use on windowsACTIVE—
019Non-metal window shutters; non-metal window screens; motorized non-metal exterior window blinds; motorized non-metal exterior window shades; non-metal exterior window blinds; non-metal exterior window shadesACTIVE—
020Interior window blinds; interior window shades; motorized interior window blinds; motorized interior window shadesACTIVE—
024Curtains; draperiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2022PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 13, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 12, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance