USPTO serial 88807947
JARDIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6383538Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2021
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JARDIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tsz Lung Yeung
1370 Valley Vista Dr., Suite 200Diamond Bar, CA 91765UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric food processors; Electric food blenders; Electric mixers for household purposes; Electric juicers | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Feb 6, 2020 |
| 011 | Electric deep fryers; Electric pressure cookers; Electric egg cookers; Electric toasters; Electric food dehydrators; Electric slow cookers; Electric waffle makers | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Feb 6, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT A IMPORT INC
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT A IMPORT INC
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT A IMPORT INC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named JARDIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2022 | NCS7 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 7 SURRENDER EMAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |