Drawing for KINETIC ARM

USPTO serial 88808069

KINETIC ARM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
INGRAM, KYLE G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KINETIC ARM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLEY M. GROSSBERG

Christopher M. Arena BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP1170 PEACHTREE STREET NEATLANTA, GA 30309-7676UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Shoulder, elbow, and arm stabilizers, braces, and sleeves for medical and orthopedic use; shoulder, elbow, and arm sleeves, being compression and stabilizing garments, for non-medical and athletic useACTIVE—
028Shoulder, elbow, and arm stabilizers being body-training apparatus, muscle assisting braces, and sleeves in the nature of arm protectors, all for non-medical and athletic useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 15, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 15, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 4, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 19, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 21, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 11, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 29, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 30, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 30, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance