USPTO serial 88813201
PEANUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOLANO, CARLITA JAYE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEANUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hun Joon Kim
Hun Joon Kim LEX IP MEISTER, PLLC.5180 PARKSTONE DRIVE, SUITE 175CHANTILLY, VA 20151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | On-line dating services being internet-based dating services; providing information regarding dating and featuring information in the field of introduction of individuals and development of romantic relationships and friendships via an interactive website; providing information regarding dating and featuring information in the field of introduction of individuals and development of romantic relationships and friendships via interactive online mobile applications; marriage counseling; planning and arranging of wedding ceremonies; providing information in the field of marriage counseling; providing internet-based marriage bureau services; providing international marriage bureau services; marriage partner introduction or dating services; wedding ceremony planning; social introduction agency services for arranging introduction of individuals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2020 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |