Drawing for GUILTLESS CHICKEN SANDWICH

USPTO serial 88813603

GUILTLESS CHICKEN SANDWICH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GUILTLESS CHICKEN SANDWICH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. Rosenstein

Robert B. Rosenstein ROSENSTEIN & ASSOCIATES28600 MERCEDES STREET SUITE 100TEMECULA, CA 92592UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Sandwiches; Sandwiches, namely, chicken sandwichesABANDONEDJul 13, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 27, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 26, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2020PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 19, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 22, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 22, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 22, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance