Drawing for LEAK TESTING ACADEMY

USPTO serial 88817219

LEAK TESTING ACADEMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAUCETTE, MAX CLIFFORD STE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAK TESTING ACADEMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly B. Markley

Molly B. Markley YOUNG, BASILE, HANLON & MACFARLANE P.C.3001 WEST BIG BEAVER ROADSUITE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Training services in the field of leak detection and the use of leak detection equipment and systems; educational and training services, namely, classes, workshops, webinars, and provision of educational training materials in the field of air, gas and water leak detectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 15, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance