USPTO serial 88818507
DEEPGREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEEPGREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gina Lupino
Gina Lupino Voyer Law Corporation403 - 134 Abbott StreetVANCOUVER, BC, V6B 2K4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metals; Base metals; Nickel; Copper; Cobalt; Manganese; Ores of metal; Nickel ores; Copper ores; Cobalt ores; Manganese ores; Polymetallic nodules harvested from the seafloor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |