Drawing for SCAN MONSTER

USPTO serial 88819325

SCAN MONSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SCAN MONSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EVAN P. EVERIST

EVAN P. EVERIST DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 SOUTH SIXTH ST SUITE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer security consultancy; Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerabilityABANDONEDFeb 7, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2022MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 24, 2022ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 24, 2022OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 24, 2022OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 12, 2021OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 11, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance