USPTO serial 88819972
GDIDZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADEYIGA, ADETAYO JANET
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GDIDZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Air pumps, hand-operated; Artificial eyelash tweezers; Beard clippers; Bread knives; Daggers; Ear piercing apparatus; Egg slicers, non-electric; Electric beard trimmers; Electric fingernail polishers; Electric hair crimper; Electric hair cutters; Electric hair straightener; Eyelash curlers; Fertilizer scoops; Fishing knives; Flat irons; Forks being table cutlery; Fruit knives; Gardening shears and scissors; Gardening trowels; Hair cutting scissors; Hand-operated apple corers; Hand-operated fruit corers; Hand-operated fruit shredders; Hand-operated lawn edgers; Hand-operated nail extractors; Hand-operated riveting tools; Hand-operated snow pushers; Hand-operated tools, namely, chisels; Hand-operated vegetable shredders; Hand saws; Hand tools, namely, crimp wrench sets; Hand tools, namely, crimp wrenches; Hand tools, namely, hammers; Hand tools, namely, nippers; Hand tools, namely, taps; Hand tools, namely, wedges; Hand tools, namely, wrenches; Hoes; Household knives; Knives being tableware; Manicure sets; Multi-purpose shears; Nail clippers; Nippers; Pedicure sets; Pliers; Razors; Scissors; Screw wrenches; Shovels; Spanners; Table cutlery; Tweezers; Vegetable slicers; Wrenches; Zesters; Electric manicure sets; Electric shavers; Hand-operated vegetable peelers; Non-electric fruit peelers; Non-electric potato peelers; Non-electric vegetable peelers; Razor blades; Scissor blades; Setting pliers; Shear blades | PARTIALLY PAID | Dec 22, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2024 | CRAF | AMENDMENT CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |