USPTO serial 88820183
DARIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DARIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SHINJUKU-KU TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J BELLUS
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Printing electronic circuits being integrated circuits for game machines and apparatus; computers; downloadable computer game programs for smartphones; mobile telephones and other telephone apparatus; computer operating programs for game machines, recorded; apparatus, namely video display monitors, and game programs for personal computers, recorded; downloadable software for use as computer game programs; downloadable software for use as game programs on smartphones; downloadable software for use as computer game programs for personal computers and home video game consoles; computer games programs, recorded; Downloadable electronic game programs, downloadable video games software, computer game discs, downloadable electronic game programs, computer game programs, recorded, for home video game machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |