Drawing for RIDEVOLO

USPTO serial 88826510

RIDEVOLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RIDEVOLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TOMMY SF WANG

TOMMY SF WANG WANG IP LAW GROUP, P.C.18645 E GALE AVE STE 205CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles, namely, motorized, electric powered, self-propelled, self-balancing, wheeled personal mobility, transportation device; e-bike, namely, electric bicycles; scooters, namely, motor scooters, push scootersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2020MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 29, 2020ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 29, 2020OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 29, 2020OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 15, 2020OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 11, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 19, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 2, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance