USPTO serial 88828391
STEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEBHARDT, JACQUELINE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad M. Stohry
Brad M. Stohry REICHEL STOHRY DEAN LLP525 S. Meridian St, Suite 1A2Indianapolis, IN 46202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Safety harnesses other than for vehicles or sports purposes, namely, safety harnesses that are used to protect a worker from falls; Fall arrestor system for climbing wooden poles, namely, belts specially designed to permit safe climbing of wooden poles; Safety equipment, namely, a lifeline anchorage system for horizontal or vertical movement to which a worker is attached for protection against fall hazards, composed of line tension indicator, turnbuckle, bars, anchors, harnesses, lanyards, cables, anchorage connectors, carabiners, lifelines, stanchions, shock absorber, tool carrying bags and cases; safety belt other than for vehicles or sports purposes, namely, safety belts that are used to protect a worker from falls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |