USPTO serial 88829066
TIDAL REPOSITORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DERBY, KAREN SHEREE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIDAL REPOSITORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristin S. Cornuelle & Seth Reagan
Kristin S. Cornuelle & Seth Reagan Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP2050 Main Street, Suite 1100Irvine, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Downloadable computer programs for enterprise process integration, managing workload job data and calendar updates in centralized repositories for use in the field of automating, managing and operating computer systems and computer data centers; Downloadable computer programs used in managing and optimizing change in workload automation platforms, organizing, storing, sharing workload job data across multiple areas including quality assurance (QA), testing, production, and other automation environments for use in the field of automating, managing and operating computer systems and computer data centers, , none of the foregoing in connection with computer software in the fields of marine research, oceanographic research, oceanic health, ocean sustainability, aquaculture, fish farming, or fishing handling | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2020 |
| 042 | (Based on Intent to Use) Providing temporary use of online non-dowloadable computer programs used in managing and optimizing change in workload automation platforms, organizing, storing, sharing workload job data across multiple areas including quality assurance (QA), testing, production, and other automation environments for use in the field of automating, managing and operating computer systems and computer data centers, , none of the foregoing in connection with computer software in the fields of marine research, oceanographic research, oceanic health, ocean sustainability, aquaculture, fish farming, or fishing handling | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 24, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |