USPTO serial 88829649
HOUSTON CONNECTSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOUSTON CONNECTSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Houston, TX, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | consumer software in the nature of mobile applications for reduction of traffic congestion, namely, computer application software for use in roadway incentive-based demand management, predicting traffic flow, generating travel routes, trip planning, GPS navigation, monitoring, predicting and calculating the trajectory of a particular route of travel, and issuing and providing incentives to users to use a particular travel route, departure time or mode of transportation, all for use in the reduction of traffic congestion and designed for use with cellular and mobile telephones and electronic communications devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Traffic management, namely, management of vehicular traffic flow through advanced communications networks and network flow algorithms; Traveler mobility and routing consulting services, namely, providing road and traffic information, inter-modal trip planning services, vehicle routing by computers on data networks, management of vehicular traffic flow through advanced communications networks and algorithms, creating special event traffic plans for others; Fleet management, namely, management of fleet vehicle assignments, scheduling, dispatching, and routing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Mobility, traffic and transportation planning and logistics services, namely, traffic and transportation planning services and providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software all for use in transportation system management, roadway incentive-based demand management, predicting traffic flow, generating travel routes, GPS navigation, monitoring, predicting and calculating the trajectory of a particular route of travel, and issuing and providing incentives to users to use a particular travel route, departure time or mode of transportation, all for use in the reduction of traffic congestion; computer algorithms and software for fleet management, namely, management of fleet vehicle assignments, scheduling, dispatching, and routing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |