USPTO serial 88832345
LUO SI FEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SULLIVAN, JOHN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUO SI FEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Liuzhou, Guangxi, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yue (Robert) Xu
Yue (Robert) Xu APEX ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP160 ALAMO PLAZA #942ALAMO, CA 94507United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cereal-based snack food; Chinese rice noodles (bifun, uncooked); Food flavourings, other than essential oils; Instant noodles; Macaroni; Noodle-based prepared meals; Noodles; Rice-based snack food; Rice flour; Sauce mixes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |