USPTO serial 88834679
JOHN JACOBS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRER PEREZ, PAUL ANTHONY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOHN JACOBS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale and retail store services and online wholesale and retail store services featuring eyeglasses and other optics related goods; import and export agency services; marketing services in the field of eye glasses, spectacles in the nature of optics, sunglasses, goggles, anti-dazzle shades, anti-glare glasses, eyeglass frames, spectacle frames, optical lenses, correcting lenses, lenses for sunglasses, spectacle lenses, optical apparatus and instruments, eyeglass chains, eyeglass cords, contact lenses, containers for contact lenses and spectacle cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Optician's services, namely, eye testing services; services of an eye clinic, namely, preparation of medical reports in relation to eye testing and providing medical assistance in relation to eye testing and suitability of eye glasses, optical lenses, contact lenses, and sun glasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lenskart Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Lenskart Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named JOHN JACOBS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 4, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |