Drawing for WEBLINK GATEWAY

USPTO serial 88836309

WEBLINK GATEWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CUMMINS, LANCE E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WEBLINK GATEWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce Hare

Bruce Hare GENIUS PATENT APC2305 HISTORIC DECATUR ROAD, SUITE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer software consultancy; Computer software development and computer programming development for others; Computer software development, computer programming and maintenance of computer software for connecting mobile devices to in vehicle systems; Software design and development; Computer software design; Computer software design for others; Computer software design, computer programming, and maintenance of computer software; Computer software development; Computer software development in the field of mobile applications; Computer network design and computer software design for the connecting of mobile devices to in vehicle systems; Design and development of computer software; Design, development, and implementation of software for connecting mobile devices to in vehicle systems; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; Developing and updating computer software; Developing computer software; Services for maintenance of computer software; Updating and design of computer softwareACTIVENov 4, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2021MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 16, 2021ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 13, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 11, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2020CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2020GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2020GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2020CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance