USPTO serial 88837245
ROLLING STONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUKER, RACHEL EVE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROLLING STONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan LaVine
Jordan LaVine FLASTER GREENBERG PCONE TOWER BRIDGE100 FRONT STREET, SUITE 100CONSHOHOCKEN, PA 19428Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio cables; Chargers for smartphones; DVD players; Earbuds; Headphones; Karaoke machines; Karaoke players; Microphones; MP3 players; Personal stereos; Turntables being record players; Audio speakers; Audio-receivers and video-receivers; Carrying cases, holders, protective cases and stands featuring power supply connectors, adaptors, speakers and battery charging devices, specially adapted for use with handheld digital electronic devices, namely, cell phones, MP3 players, personal digital assistants, and personal stereos; Personal digital assistants (PDA); Portable listening devices, namely, MP3 players; Protective carrying cases for portable music players; Radio receivers; Stereo receivers, all of the foregoing relating to the Rolling Stone publication(s) | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, except beer, all of the foregoing relating to the Rolling Stone publication(s) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2023 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |