USPTO serial 88838601
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nitin Kaushik
50 LERER LANESTATEN ISLAND, NY 10307UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software and downloadable application software for making electronic payments, banking, and conducting insurance matters in the field of financial affairs | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Electronic payments, electronic management of transactions and payments via global computer networks; bill payment services; Financial affairs and monetary affairs, namely, financial information, management and analysis services; Insurance underwriting; Credit information services, namely, credit inquiry and consultation featuring credit assessment services, evaluation of the credit worthiness of companies and private individuals; Loan financing services featuring loans and credit services; credit card factoring services; Debt collection services; Banking services; Money transfers; Preparation, processing and tracking of electronic payment transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software development within the field of financial affairs, electronic payments, monetary affairs, banking and insurance | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |