USPTO serial 88841720
SOCIAL PURPOSE EXCHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOCIAL PURPOSE EXCHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North York, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Clady
Susan E. Clady BENESCH FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP127 PUBLIC SQUARE, SUITE 4900SUITE 2300CLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable multimedia news podcasts; downloadable multimedia news webcasts; downloadable multimedia news weblogs; downloadable radio podcasts in the field of news; downloadable video recordings featuring music | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | distribution of news podcasts in the nature of electronic data transmission services; podcasting of news shows in the nature of electronic transmission services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of social media content, namely, podcasts, electronic media, multimedia content, videos, movies, pictures, images, text, photos, games, user-generated content, audio content, and related information in the field of corporate responsibility, corporate environmental responsibility, responsible business decision making, and corporate creation of global sustainable value; entertainment services, namely, providing news podcasts; podcasting of music in the nature of production of podcasts; podcasting of news shows in the nature of production of podcasts; entertainment in the nature of social media content, namely, providing a website featuring non-downloadable podcast videos in the field of entertainment news and music | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |