USPTO serial 88844356
QUESTIONABLEID SYNTHETIC FRAUD DEFENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUESTIONABLEID SYNTHETIC FRAUD DEFENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURA T. GEYER
LAURA T. GEYER VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP1909 K STREET, NWNINTH FLOORWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | monitoring and synthetic fraud alert services in the field of financial identity security and protection, namely, monitoring consumer financial and identity information and indicating potential fraud for business purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Payment verification services; payment and funds verification services; fraud detection services, namely, financial data and statistical analysis of credit behavioral data and personally identifiable information for fraud detection | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing user authentication services in the nature of analysis of user identity and user behavior data for pattern and attribute recognition, all for the purpose of fraud detection and prevention in the field of insurance, credit cards, banking, retail, and financial transactions; Fraud detection services in the field of insurance, credit cards, banking, retail and financial transactions, namely, providing user identity authentication services using analysis of credit reporting databases and other technology; Monitoring and fraud alert services in the nature of electronic monitoring of identity and behavioral information in the form of personally identifying information to detect identity theft via the internet for use in detecting synthetic identity fraud via the internet; authentication in the field of finance, namely, consumer authentication services for credit accounts to determine synthetic identity fraud of applicants and accountholders; Fraud monitoring, detection and alert services in the nature of electronic monitoring of identity and behavioral data in the form of verifying credit behavior and personally identifying information to detect synthetic identity fraud via the internet; Fraud detection services in the field of credit cards, consumer loans, and payment cards for financial transactions, namely, providing electronic fraud detection and monitoring for credit transactions and receivables management for creditors via the Internet; Fraud detection services, namely, providing electronic fraud detection and monitoring for credit transactions and receivables management for creditors via the Internet for use in the collection of credit accounts and to be used in credit cards, banking and retail/financial transactions; Fraud monitoring services for creditors, namely, electronic monitoring via the internet of credit behavior data and analysis of personal identity information to detect fraud and providing an alert as to changes therein via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | alarm response and verification services; verification of personal identity as part of personal background investigations; applicant authentication services, namely, review and analysis of consumer behavior and identity information for patterns reflecting synthetic identity fraud and communication of same to creditors; Fraud alert services, namely, providing periodic fraud alert and fraud detection services in the fields of credit and lending and receivables management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovis Data Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovis Data Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named QUESTIONABLEID SYNTHETIC FRAUD DEFENSE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2021 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |