Drawing for LONDON ROYAL RAVENS

USPTO serial 88845666

LONDON ROYAL RAVENS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LONDON ROYAL RAVENS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robyn S. Lederman

Robyn S. Lederman Brooks Kushman P.C.22nd Floor1000 Town CenterSouthfield, MI 48075

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education services, namely, providing mentoring, tutoring, classes, seminars and workshops in the field of electronic game competitions; education or entertainment services, namely, organization of electronic game competitions; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; organization of sports competitions, presentation of live show performances; providing on-line electronic publications, not downloadable, in the nature of magazines and brochures in the fields of sports and computer games; production of radio and television programs; providing on-line music, not downloadable; providing on-line videos electronic game competitions, not downloadable; entertainment services, namely, entertainment in the nature of circuses and providing on-line video games; entertainment information; game services provided on-line from a computer network, namely, providing an on-line board game and providing an on-line computer game; entertainment in the nature of arranging and conducting electronic sports and video game contests, tournaments, exhibitions, and competitionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2022NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 21, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 4, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 4, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2022EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2022EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 25, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 18, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 9, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 17, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 2, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance