USPTO serial 88845784
SCANACON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 2021
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SCANACON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $975
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ARLANDASTAD, SE
ARLANDASTAD, SE
ARLANDASTAD, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Hrina
David J. Hrina BRENNAN, MANNA & DIAMOND, LLC75 E. MARKET STREETAKRON, OH 44308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical calibration solutions containing hydrofluoric acid, sulphuric acid, nitric acid, and hydrochloric acid for use in steel industry; unprocessed synthetic resins for use in the production of steel | ACTIVE | Feb 8, 2013 |
| 009 | Electronic acid control system for acid recovery systems comprised of acid analyzer, acid recovery unit, acid filtration unit, acid circulation unit, and acid dosage unit; apparatus for analysis of mineral acids, namely, acid analyzer; analysis probes used for measurements of acid density; recorded computer programs for measurements of milli voltages and calculation of acid concentration by a specific formula, logging of measured data, all for use in the steel product industry | ACTIVE | Feb 8, 2013 |
| 042 | Technology supervision and inspections and technology consultation and technological research regarding analysis, environment, and security equipment in the steel production industry; technological guidance and professional technological consultation in the field of steel fabrication and steel and stainless steel production; engineering chemical consultation services, chemical analysis, calibration of analysis instruments; computer software design for others, computer programming for others, updating computer software | ACTIVE | Feb 8, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Scanacon AB
- Other trademarks owned by Scanacon AB
- Other trademarks owned by Scanacon AB
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SCANACON
- Prosecution event R.PR explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | ISSR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |