USPTO serial 88846441
BOONDOGGLERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUMM, WHITLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOONDOGGLERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Hamilton
Jennifer Hamilton Avyno Law, PC6345 Balboa Blvd, Ste. 312Encino, CA 91316UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective covers and cases for cell phones; lanyards specially adapted for carrying cell phones; electric charging cables; portable radio; portable speakers; megaphones; measuring cups; measuring spoons; headsets for virtual reality games | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household goods, namely, non-electronic portable coolers, insulated containers for food or beverage, bottle openers; kitchen utensils, namely, spatulas, ladles, serving forks, whisks, serving spoons, tongs, ice cream scoop; grilling utensils, namely, spatulas, tongs, cleaning brushes, basting brushes, cooking forks and scrapers | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games, namely, parlor games, party games, action target games and action skill games; tabletop games; table top games in the nature of football games, foosball games, hockey games, paddle ball games, chess, backgammon, casino poker, roulette, table tennis, bowling games; apparatus for virtual reality catching and throwing games, namely, ball projectors and paddles and ball projectors and gloves; playing card shuffler; arcade games; dart games; tossing games in the nature of equipment sold as a unit for playing tossing games; building games; toss games in the nature of disc toss games and bean bag toss games; board games; puzzles; mind teaser puzzles; puzzle box; equipment sold as a unit for playing flag football; footballs; basketball table top games; cornhole game sets; cornhole bags; cornhole game boards; equipment sold as a unit for playing bocce ball, paddle ball, badminton, lawn darts, capture the flag and trampoline ball games; chess sets; chess games; dominoes; equipment sold as a unit for playing drinking games; drinking wheel game; dice games; playing cards; jumbo waterproof playing cards; marshmallow launcher; paddle ball games; pinball games; hand-held party poppers; basketball hoops; handheld games in the nature of handheld basketball and table tennis games; handheld electronic games; inflatable games in the nature of target football and baseball; toys in the nature of remote control toys, namely, toy vehicles, toy wrestlers, toy animal figurines and toy missile launcher; toy cars; robotic toys; toy robots; smart robot toys; toy robotic arms; transforming robotic toys; transforming robotic toy vehicles; toy coin bank; toy slot machine; toy light-up necklace; prank kit comprised of fake bugs, hand buzzers for playing jokes, disappearing ink, snapping devices and air cushions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MerchSource, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MerchSource, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BOONDOGGLERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2021 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 19, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |