USPTO serial 88847141
SECURITY AS A BUSINESS ASSET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 2020
- Examiner
- CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SECURITY AS A BUSINESS ASSET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenwood Village, CO
Greenwood Village, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Weinstein
3045 EAST ALAMEDA AVENUEDENVER, CO 80209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity engineering; Systems Engineering in the nature of computer system design; Security engineering, namely, design and development of electronic data security systems; Risk management, namely, development of customized software for others for use in risk assessment; Vulnerability assessment, namely, computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Risk A and A (Assessment and Authorization), namely, computer security consultancy; Computer network design for others; Cloud storage services for electronic data; business technology continuity services, namely, technical consulting in the of field of electronic system continuity for businesses; Computer disaster recovery planning; Operational redundancy in the nature of technical advice relating to operation of computers; Program governance, namely, technical administration of servers for others; IT project management in the nature of consulting in the field of IT project management; System implementation and monitoring, namely, planning, design and implementation of computer technologies for others and monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns | ACTIVE | Jun 20, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 1, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |