USPTO serial 88850921
HIGH CASTLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIGH CASTLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter W. Becker
Peter W. Becker CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | non-alcoholic water-based beverages; lemonade; sports drink; sparkling water; still water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |