USPTO serial 88850924
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, BC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter W. Becker
Peter W. Becker CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | herbs for smoking; equipment and accessories for use in smoking, namely, pipes, water pipes, bongs, hookahs, nebulizers, atomizers, buccal sprays, oral vaporizers for smokers, rolling papers, electronic cigarettes, lighters, pipe screens, pipe cleaners, pipe screens, pipe pouches, ashtrays, containers, tanks, cases, scooper/scraper stick for pocket apparatus for rolling cigarette, point rolling machines, and filter tips | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail distribution in the field of herbs for smoking; Online retail distribution in the field of herbs for smoking; Wholesale distributorships featuring herbs for smoking | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |