USPTO serial 88856117
JOURNEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JOURNEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly Bullock Gatling
Kimberly Bullock Gatling FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 Lenox Drive, Bldg. #3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplements, namely, nutraceuticals in the form of beverages and edibles not containing psilocybin or psilocyn | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Dried edible fungi; edible fungi oils; none of the foregoing containing psilocybin or psilocyn | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh edible fungi not containing psilocybin or psilocyn | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 7, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |