USPTO serial 88862488
ACTINAV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTINAV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meichelle R. MacGregor
Meichelle R. MacGregor COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 WEST 47TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools, namely, industrial robots for all purposes and Machines and machine tools for cutting and forming of materials; industrial robots and automation equipment, namely, parts and fittings for machines and machine tools, namely, grippers, vacuum grippers, robotic hands, mounts; separating machines for industry, namely, industrial robots for separating, sorting, manufacturing, processing, handling and assembling commercial goods; collection equipment, namely, industrial robots for collecting, manufacturing, processing, handling, picking and assembling commercial goods; industrial robots | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for controlling, programming, manufacturing, processing, handling and assembling goods; downloadable computer software applications for controlling, programming, manufacturing, processing, handling and assembling robots, robot parts accessories and automated machines; downloadable computer software applications for motion planning of industrial robots for all purposes; downloadable computer software for use in cloud computing and data storage; computer hardware; computer hardware for controlling, programming, manufacturing, processing, handling and assembling robots, robot parts accessories and automated machines; computer hardware applications for motion planning of industrial robots for all purposes; money counting and sorting machines; interfaces for computers; electronic sensors for robots and robotic parts and accessories, namely, electronic sensors for measuring distance, position and proximity not for medical use; electric sensors for measuring distance, position and proximity; collection equipment, namely, computer hardware and downloadable software for facilitating the collection and sorting of commercial goods by industrial robots; automation equipment, namely, parts and fittings for machines and machine tools, namely, vision systems primarily comprised of sensors, cameras, powers sources, recorded operating software and control software | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Installation of computer software, updating of computer software, namely, updating, repair and maintenance of computer software; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for controlling, programming, manufacturing, processing, handling and assembling robots | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Robots A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Robots A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ACTINAV
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 25, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |