USPTO serial 88871732
GENESIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAFARI-PEARSON, NIYA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GENESIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J HOISINGTON
MICHAEL J HOISINGTON HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP401 W A STREET SUITE 2600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Guitars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |