Drawing for WORLD SERIES OF YOUTH BASKETBALL

USPTO serial 88883168

WORLD SERIES OF YOUTH BASKETBALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORLD SERIES OF YOUTH BASKETBALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael P. Martin

Michael P. Martin FISCHBACH, PERLSTEIN, LIEBERMAN & ALMOND, LLP1925 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 2050LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of basketball games; all of the foregoing not relating to baseball or softball or to a baseball or softball team, league, mascot, stadium or eventACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 8, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 2021ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2021CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 28, 2021EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 2, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance